Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Youtube button

Posts Tagged ‘paid for acting’

Extra-Work For Non-Actors: ‘To Fall Back On’?

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 11th April 2009 in Of Interest

Acting Work As Security?

In this period of recession, could it be that lots of people who are out of work are looking to acting, as a security? Trying to become ‘background’, or what is commonly known as ‘extra work’?

Who’d-ever-a-thunk-that?

Acting gigs, as fallback employment? Now, that’s a switch!

Reportedly, Central Casting, an agency that solely handles background work, is getting over 300 new registrants per week. And, they’re not aspiring actors…

This article appeared in the LA Times last week, written by Jodie Burke…


Background player hopefuls are flooding Central Casting and similar agencies as opportunities in other fields dry up.

Nathan Johnson has landed in one of the longest unemployment lines in Los Angeles. Just another face in the crowd, Johnson is here because he’s hoping to get a job as, yes, just another face in the crowd. But the crowd keeps getting bigger every day.


The lobby at Central Casting is so packed it seems impossible that one more person could squeeze through the door. Johnson, 30, handsome and elegant in a crisp, white shirt, has been waiting to sign up for an hour. “It feels like two hours,” he says, eyeing the registration desk. It’s only a few feet away, but it will take a lot of patience to reach it. “I’m an EMT,” he says, gazing around the congested room with the sort of dignity that Will Smith might envy. Utter cool in a crisis. “If someone goes into cardiac arrest, I’m there.”


Johnson has been out of work for two years. He injured his shoulder, which made it impossible for him to do the heavy lifting required in his medical tech job, and he’s seen the toll of the recession all around him. “All my friends who owned houses are out of them now,” he says. He grew up in Venice, but when the housing boom hit, his old beachside neighborhood became gentrified almost overnight. “The past five years was kind of a greed session, and now everybody’s got a hangover.”


Background artists, also known as “atmosphere” or extras, are the folks whose mere presence on the set makes the land of make-believe seem real. They are the entertainment industry’s most reliable temporary workers and, since 1926, Central Casting has been supplying the creators of feature films, TV shows and commercials with most of them. Three days a week, for one hour, Central registers anyone 18 or over with a spare 25 bucks (cash only) and the documentation to prove they’re legal to work in the United States to be a nonunion extra with the company.


There’s no interview to sweat. No psychological tests to take. No experience required. Nonunion extras make a humble $64 a day and must follow strict orders: Never look at the camera. Never speak to principal actors or the director. Stay out of the way. Basically, keep your head down and your mouth shut.


Clutching their identification cards as tightly as their dreams, people have always flooded into Central Casting looking for work, taking that first step to become a star…


“Whenever there’s a downturn in the economy, we see an increase in the number of people applying for background work,” says Allen Kennamer, vice president of Central Casting. “The line started getting longer right after the first of the year,” he says. “It started to double in size.” Lately Central’s been registering more and more people, about 300 a week, a total of 50,000, for noticeably fewer jobs.


This warehouse building on an industrial, dead-end street in Burbank is an interesting window into the recession in Southern California: It’s where anxious folks from all walks of life, not only the entertainment industry, come seeking a big break.


Brian Estwick, 42, is a chess teacher. Until last December, he taught at an after-school program in Pacific Palisades but lost his job when the funding was cut. Estwick has never done professional acting, but his family’s been encouraging him to try. “My brother’s been pushing me to come in because I’ve got a different look,” he says. When asked to describe it, he laughs, an earthquake rumbling through 320 pounds of muscle. “The guy from ‘The Green Mile’: an athletic, big black guy.”


If he does land background work, it seems unlikely that he’ll stay there long. Estwick hasn’t even registered and already his overall shorts, black clogs and smart-as-an-owl glasses are attracting a lot of attention. “I got lucky today,” he says. “As soon as I walked in, a casting director came out from the back, told me I had a good look and took my name.”


“Casting extras is like painting with people,” notes David Feige, co-creator and supervising producer of TNT’s legal show “Raising the Bar.” The show, which is shot in Los Angeles, is based on Feige’s real-life experience as a public defender in the Bronx, N.Y. Feige didn’t know much about Hollywood when he arrived and was fascinated by the process. “The extras casting really made an impression on me,” Feige says.


For the pilot, he helped select people to fill in the jury and crowd the hallways and courtroom. “I remember vividly sitting down and they pulled out an ocean of pictures. It was crazy,” he says. “The possibilities are so vast. You really are creating this universe, and you can populate it with almost anyone. ‘What we need is an old guy with a walker.’ ‘OK, here’s 50.’ Of course the process of choosing is oddly dehumanizing, precisely because you’ve never spoken a word to any of these people and ultimately you’re evaluating them as textures rather than individuals. Like pointillism, it’s only when you step back and your eye scans over the whole group that you get the effect of the individual choices.”



Christina Tucker, 45, is hoping to get temporary work as an extra after being laid off from a 27-year career as a postproduction audio technician. She’s worked on big hits: ” Law & Order,” “Ghost Whisperer” and “House.” “Scooby Doo,” her most recent employer, dogged her with a pink slip last April. “Warner Bros. cut the whole animation department in January 2008. They cut it [by a] third,” she says, emphasizing that fraction. “Now I’m just trying to find a chair.” That’s what the sound techies call it when you’re looking for your next big job.


Opportunity wanes


As the recession deepens across California, Hollywood’s extra casting reflects a Catch-22: The labor pool is growing at a time when film studios are shedding staff and dropping projects, independent filmmakers are finding it harder to raise financing, and television studios are making more reality TV shows that don’t require atmosphere and far fewer dramas and comedies that do.


“There’s a lot less work to go around,” says Kevin Goldson, a casting associate with Idell James Casting in Pacific Palisades, a company that competes with Central Casting but focuses strictly on advertising. That industry experienced sharp declines in 2008 when advertisers, particularly the automotive industry, which favored Los Angeles as a location for many of its car commercials, cut back on spending.


According to FilmL.A., the nonprofit organization that hands out permits for the city and keeps track of local filming, on-location commercial production days was down 17.4% in the fourth quarter of 2008, compared with the same quarter of 2007. It suffered a loss of 10.9% for the year. “It’s very slow and a lot of people are worried, because a lot of people did extra work for a living,” Goldson says. “When the budgets are cut, where they cut is the background because it’s cheaper to shoot with less people.”


The picture doesn’t get any sunnier for feature films: 2008 was the worst year for local feature production since FilmL.A. began tracking it in 1993. The major studios are making fewer movies, and they’re not shooting many of them in California anymore. Feature production in Los Angeles has been down 10 of the last 12 years. The number of production days FilmL.A. logged for 2008 is half of what it was during its most recent peak in 1996 and is a record low.


Television production, often called the bread and butter of the industry, remains the one bright spot on the local production landscape, but that is mostly because of reality programming. Production days in reality TV rose 19% in 2008. Sometimes talk shows and game shows will hire extras to fill out their audiences, but scripted television provides most of the background jobs, and those numbers tell a much different story.

Who Are These “Middle Class Actors” That SAG Is Representing?

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 11th February 2009 in Minding Your Business of Acting, SAG Strike + SAG Negotiations

Some Professional, Middle-Class Actors Made Videos About Issues Of Grave Concern.

Do you recognize some of these professional actors, in these videos?

They Are Not From The Press, And That’s A Solid Blessing, In This Case

The good news is, these videos talk about the real issues; and just how imperative they are…How damaging it will be to accept this ‘AMPTP contract’, for the future of all actors, and to the profession altogether.

 

These middle-class actors did the math.  

For you.

They looked over the legalese, and all the boring stuff, so you don’t have to…

Maybe it’s because they are real working actors.  

And, they’re not obscuring what is important, with all that other stuff…gossipy-drama that most of the press puts front-and-center; when discussing SAG, altogether. And, yes, even most of the bloggers do that too.  Even those that claim to be “an expert” on the topic.  (Um, those people that write those articles, aren’t actors usually.)

 

Like I say, often, here at Hollywood Actor Prep…it takes a professional actor…

It takes an actor to understand an actor’s life.

It takes one to know one.  It takes one to understand one.  And, it takes one to inform  and advise another.

It takes an actor to explain what the issues are, and how it can impact all actors…now, and in the future.  

So, here they are.  Here we are

 

The Actors. You. Me. All Of Us…Solidarity.

I appreciate you watching these videos, and thank you for taking a look at the issues.  And I hope you will tell others.

….That’s far more than what the journalists have been doing. Ironically.  (It appears to me, that most journalists may not even know what the issues are, or that there are issues and conflicts.  Is it reporter-laziness?  Is it just easier to make fun of Alan Rosenberg, or talk about this star or that one, than to research about the AMPTP? Or do they think it attracts more readers?? Lots of people say that the reporters are also paid by the same people as those on the AMPTP, like Rupert Murdoch…That may be true, but I don’t think it’s that complex….I think it’s just laziness.  It takes time & effort, to look into a contract. Takes none,  to ‘throw mud around’. )

 

I think that actors, profoundly,  contribute to our culture.

And, to be redundant, because I will say this again and again, happily.  

(And then… once more with feeling!)

I think that actors are valuable.  

I think that actors deserve to be paid. And to be regarded as valuable professionals.  

I think that actors deserve to be treated with dignity, and allowed to earn money and healthcare…a living.


I believe that every time an actor performs, that actor should receive payment.

And that includes performances live, OR recorded.  

I firmly believe, that when any venue, studio, channel, or internet station, : especially when they make money from sponsors/advertising, and the sponsors are paying for productions that feature actors, that the producers should compensate the actors.  

Elementary, right?  Well, they don’t plan to.  

That’s what this is all about.  

Surprised?

 

Call me a “hardliner”, but I don’t think exploitation is ever acceptable.

And, I do believe the AMPTP contract is exploitative. And, I think they are quite aware of that.  I think they know the inherent implications that come along with it.  

Are you aware that they are clear, that they, flat out,  intend to keep all earnings for themselves. While using the work of actors, to earn it.  And there are earnings, and these earnings are increasing, all the time.  Especially on the ‘net.

All the while, the actors, will be unpaid and impoverished, as a result. Really. Impoverishing them individually, and their families, and all the ramifications that come with that.

It will have a devastating effect on the profession of acting, altogether.  A career that is regarded as perilous already. Rendered utterly, truly, impossible.

The AMPTP, quite consciously,  created this situation.  They knew, all along,  that they were offering actors a terrible, lessening, deal.  

They also used a lot of PR, they hired marketing experts, even for the internet.(Look it up on Google, if interested in more details.) They knew that the timing was terrible for a SAG Strike; and they were able to use the current public economic fear, to their advantage.

So they’ve been paying a lot to feed the public some very persuasive, and mostly, obfuscating information.

To the max, they power-played… They played on the public’s insecurity about the economic situation of our country, to somehow flip it around…and make the actor the “bad guy”. They played on the fear that every actor lives with, and professional insecurity. 

(And, some of the problems were waged between actors themselves…because like any lesser class in any social social system, in terms of wealth or power; when the lowest classes can’t fight back, they fight who the ones they can. Themselves.  Especially when the pressure, anxiety, and potential loss, is so high.)

 

Generally, the acting profession is a mystery, for the public.

Unfortunately, that has served to weaken the interest, and the severity of the actors’ side, in this conflict.

 

The public regards the acting profession, in one of two ways:

  • Illogical, and fruitless, as far as income.
    • or
  • Overpaid movie stars.

That’s just not so.  There are many, many actors who earn a living; just a living, in the acting profession.

 

As for actors, well…most don’t even know the issues, themselves.

I hate to admit that, and to see such lack of interest too.  But, I think I know why that is…

That has to do with their professional stature. Because, at different caliber levels, the professional experience vastly differs. As does the actors’ personal life. Social experiences, too.

Interests, and goals, too.  Perspectives.  

Younger actors,  who are just beginning, only can focus on trying to get a foothold in, professionally.  They aren’t concerned with livlihood, not yet.

And, the very successful stars, well, you’ve heard some of their opinions…but the truth is, they can’t relate.

It’s so very far from their experience…They just don’t need to worry about dollars-and-cents, in their lives. Things like residuals, and even the internet, are not issues that have anything to do with them. And they do live pampered, cloistered lives. (They actually do.)  So they just don’t get it.

Even though they may appear to be wise, it is within the realm of their “blindspot”.  Their perspective is just too far removed from actors, on the other strata.

 

As actors, we can always use support, but it’s very necessary, now.  

And, we need solidarity.  So please, connect with each other, and inform each other. 

And public awareness. (Because if the issues & facts & ‘the math’ doesn’t make it into the press, then we can get the knowledge out there, right?)

Please send this post to your friends who act, or wish to. Professional or not.   

Because if it’s your profession, your life, then they should know.  And, it would be good for you to support that profession…

It may be that if we don’t consolidate, there may not-be-an-acting-profession in the future.

We must get the issues out to the public, because it isn’t happening in the media, otherwise.  

…The actors’ stance and SAG  is losing power, every day, as a result.  

Please email this post to your friends, it’s so-o easy and takes a second, only.  Send it to all of them, because it’s very important to get the public to know the facts. Put it on your Facebook page…Your MySpace…

Use the “SHARE” widget down below, the white one…it will take you right to your email or Facebook page, etc. Directly, too, no clicking around or filling in stuff…

Thanks, for all of us…

And keep the faith. 

Follow me on Twitter, if you don’t already….my Twitter name is __dana__.  (Twitter registration is the shortest…!)

 

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkmKbRSfTlI[/youtube]

Once again, I ask you to please share by emailing to your actor friends, and to others, as well. Actors need the public to know, and to be in support of the profession, right now.


Best,
Dana

SAG Actors Get A New Vote: But About Contract, Instead of Strike?

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 15th January 2009 in SAG Strike + SAG Negotiations

Better news for all actors: Now a win-win-win situation?

New SAG Plan: instead of putting out a “strike authorization”, for the professional actors, of SAG to vote on…they are sending out something different…an AMPTP contract authorization. Directly, to the SAG members, to see it for themselves, and to vote on whether to accept it or not.

What IS the AMPTP CONTRACT, actually?? Well, it states the “bottom line” level, (the lowest pay scale) that they are proposing: to pay for acting…now and in the future.

(….What they are ‘offering’ is “bupkus”…)

It’s not much different, now, it’s just a direct choice for actors, instead of the representative leadership.

(This is according to Nikki Finke’s column: ‘Deadline Hollywood’ and if you really want the skinny on the underhanded moves of the AMPTP during this, and during the prior Writer’s Strike (WGA), she’s the one with the real goods, and the guts…)

Alan Rosenberg

Alan Rosenberg

The SAG Strike would’ve been about whether or not to accept the same contract.

If the SAG strike is what is causing such terror and public uproar, then…

My own vote, on this changed-SAG-vote, is that it’s brilliant!

So much wasted energy, and actor leverage/actor-power has been spent on internal arguing and blaming. Blaming the people that are available and safe to be blamed. (Can’t bite the hand that feeds, right?)

Ridiculous, I have always thought…for actors to blame the Alan/Allen leaders of SAG.

(BTW…SAG Leadership didn’t compose the AMPTP CONTRACT ! That was created by the hands that won’t feed you, Actors. Those that think you will do anything for a job, and actually…besides not paying you for your work, the AMPTP contract —the new “final” contract, according to the Producers/Movie Studios side—literally takes away meal breaks. While working. So, under the new terms, not only will you not be able to afford food, to eat at home…you won’t even get a food break on a 10 hour day, on the job. Is it okay, with you, not to eat? Dieting, aside, I do mean.

It’s called “French Hours” by the way, having no set meal-breaks. You just nibble when you can, if there’s time. Apparently, they film that way in France…Fine, I’d agree to it, here, if they’d start serving fine French food on movie sets.

You know what would really win me over?? If the AMPTP started to give actors a teeny tiny bit of the honor that France gives to their actors, and artists of all kinds. Or how about just a bit of respect. (Even a false showing, that would be better than anything I’ve seen yet. )

Oh, and if they create a national, official government office called “Ministry Of The Arts”–Just as they have in France…

Ahhh, oui, I digress. I rannnntttt.)

I do think that SAG’s new tact is a great turn of events. Let all the actors read over exactly what they won’t have. Let them see who the real boogeyman is. Let all see the real numbers..I mean, the real money offered. And who is not willing to spread it around, to those who they even call: “the Talent”.

allen-sag

Doug Allen

…Some actors may not ‘get’ how this all applies to them, at all…

And I urge you, all, to-think-as-successful-working-actors. And if you are not one, now, then think “as-if”.

(Because I know that part of this conflict has to do with all different economic levels of actors, all trying to agree on the same contractual items, and they all mean different things to different actors

Example: For an actor who has never worked, the $28 dollars that the AMPTP is offering for per-show (with no residuals for any re-play)…well, that may seem great to a young actor who has never had a paying job. Or who has spent a year, breaking their back, suffering indignities, and maybe doing “background”/extra work, so as to get their “3 jobs” so they could qualify for eligibility for a SAG card…)

To them, a real job, any job, feels like reward enough.**

It’s not.

I’ve been on both ends of the acting career spectrum.

And all in-between….Trust my words: time keeps moving. And so does your acting career, with the right amount of determination. You can get acting work, with the right amount of skill, determination, and intelligent focus. Yes, you can, and you will, then.

And…if and when you make that happen… you will want to earn a living, and even live well…you will want payment, adequate, just paymentfor your work. For your talent. As an actor.

It’s hard work.

Almost certainly, you will still love it.

And…because you will be eating, too; you will be glad you did.

Best,

:Dana

Here’s recent excepts from SAG’s website:

Subject: Message from Doug Allen, SAG National Executive Director

January 14, 2009

Dear SAG National Board Members and Alternates,

Because the executive session of our recent extraordinary National Board meeting occurred without my presence in the room, I want to directly communicate several points to all board members and alternates.

I began and ended my report to the National Board on January 12 by stating that I have followed and always will follow the directives of the National Board expressed by a unanimous or majority vote. Under my leadership all SAG staff has complied and will comply with those directives as well. I also said that I am by SAG constitution and by employment contract accountable to the board for my performance.

I welcome your review of that performance and respectfully request only that, in the interest of fairness, such review include the opportunity for me to discuss with the board any comments, questions or issues you wish to raise, not in lieu of executive session discussion, but prior to such discussion.

It is unfortunate that the important matters contained in the National Board meeting ag enda were not accomplished at the meeting January 12 and 13. I know that opinions vary sharply on why that happened. From my perspective, to the extent AMPTP positions or actions are the problem, the solution cannot be determined by how intensely you fight among yourselves.

Regarding the TV/Theatrical negotiations, and the sharply divided opinions on the board about how to proceed, I offered the following suggestion to a cross section of Guild leaders during the period of the executive session. I asked that they discuss the suggestion with other board members in attendance. I proposed that the strike authorization referendum be suspended and that management’s offer be put to the membership in a ratification vote. I also proposed that, before that membership ratification vote, we meet immediately with the AMPTP to determine to what extent, if any, they are willing to improve their last offer, to maximize its chances for ratification. I further proposed that the offer then be sent to the members with Pro and Con statements from National Board members and that otherwise the Guild would remain neutral during any member debate regarding ratification. This process will give Screen Actors Guild members the opportunity to formally express themselves on the bargaining issues.

This suggestion was communicated to some, but not all board members in attendance, and apparently was rejected by some who heard it, at least in part, because they believe I could not be “trusted” to implement it. Since I am the one proposing it and since I have never acted contrary to the directives of the National Board, that is not a reasonable objection. In any case, if it is the decision of the National Board to proceed as I have proposed, I assure you that the staff and I will carry out your decision faithfully and diligently.

I will convene an Officers’ call this week to discuss this suggestion and how it might be considered and implemented. I encourage all board members to discuss these issues with the Guild officers or with me in advance of the call.

There are no more important issues before us than the conclusion of the TV/Theatrical Contract negotiations and the initiation of the Commercial Contract negotiations. Super-heated rhetoric through the press will not contribute to our success on behalf of the members. Working together to resolve your differences will.

Doug Allen


Two days before, Alan Rosenberg sent out this to the SAG board members:

Los Angeles, (January 13, 2009) — SAG National President Alan Rosenberg sent the following message to Screen Actors Guild national board members and alternates today:

“At the end of the National Board plenary meeting this afternoon, a group of board members submitted a document to the Guild that purports to deal with the employment of the National Executive Director and the continuing approach to negotiations. After analyzing the document, Screen Actors Guild’s in-house and outside counsel have concluded that the document does not constitute a valid written assent, for several reasons, including a lack of sufficient signatures and the absence of any language on the document demonstrating the intent of the signers to grant their assent to the proposal. Guild National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator Doug Allen and the National Television and Theatrical Contract Negotiating Committee remain committed to advancing the cause of actors and our crucial contract negotiations.”

No substantive actions were taken by the Guild’s national board, which met at SAG’s national headquarters January 12 and 13 for almost 30 hours straight.

No mailing date has been set for the previously approved TV/Theatrical strike authorization referendum.

We have no further comment.

ABOUT SAG, FROM THEIR WEBSITE;
Screen Actors Guild is the nation’s largest labor union representing working actors. Established in 1933, SAG has a rich history in the American labor movement, from standing up to studios to break long-term engagement contracts in the 1940s to fighting for artists’ rights amid the digital revolution sweeping the entertainment industry in the 21st century. With 20 branches nationwide, SAG represents over 120,000 actors who work in film and digital television, industrials, commercials, video games, music videos and all other new media formats. The Guild exists to enhance actors’ working conditions, compensation and benefits and to be a powerful, unified voice on behalf of artists’ rights. SAG is a proud affiliate of the AFL-CIO. Headquartered in Los Angeles, you can visit SAG online at www.sag.org
.

Please continue to share on Facebook, and MySpace, and with all your friends. Especially, to actors. It’s important to get the messages out, it really is! Thanks very much!

And, follow me on Twitter for updates, and info- (link below)

http://twitter.com/__dana__



Acting Residuals — Why + When — Brief History In Broadcasting

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 6th January 2009 in SAG Strike + SAG Negotiations, Television acting, acting business

Rare Television Acting Clips:

One with Paul Newman, and one with James Dean        

      …at bottom of post…( Heydon’t skip now!  )

 


Acting Residuals Began In Radio Days

Residuals are entirely a “show business” invention, and an American invention. They were conceived in the era of radio broadcasting, when technological advances created a broadcasting dilemma…which arose when recording became possible. 

earth-radio1

Prior, on radio,  all American broadcasting was performed live.  And…just like the regular programming we now have on television, there were regularly scheduled programs, on radio.

Except there was no “recording” yet.

 

Acting Live, Radio Program

Acting :: Radio

All the programs were performed, by actors, live.  

Every show, every time.  Due to the expanse of America, and different time zones; the shows were performed twice a day…Once, for the Eastern part of America,\; and a second for the Pacific Standard Time Zone.

Actors would need to be at a studio, at the time of broadcast, and physically perform the shows over the air. They would get paid for their performance.  Paid for each performance; the same as they would for every live performance in a theater.

joan-crawford

Joan Crawford

Technology Evolved, and Acting Was Able To Be Recorded

In the mid-1930’s, they figured out a primitive way to record the shows.  The actors wouldn’t have to act each performance out more than once, per each episode. 

 

fanny-brice

Fanny Brice, Comedy Actress

Or so it was conceived.  But the recording technology wasn’t reliable enough, not at first.  

 

Actors Still Performed Live, For The First Show, At Least

And it was broadcast that way, with the actors gathered around a microphone, performing in the studio.

But because the recording was such a new technology, and not yet reliable, the actors would have to remain in the studio, waiting around, to be sure that the recording was good enough for the next time-zone broadcast. 

If not, they would act out the entire show,  live, once again.

Superman, Acted Live, On Radio

Superman, Acted Live, On Radio

Thus, the term “residual”.  Actors were paid for their performances for the second show, just like when they performed it live.  Except the residuals were the payment for the recorded broadcast of their performance.   This began in 1941.

 

 Acting Was Live Only, In Early Television Performances

miss_america

When television broadcasting came about, in the 1950’s, all performances were live also; the only thing that broadcast on TV that wasn’t live were actual movies: “re-runs”…which were originally made for, and had played first, in movie theatres.

In 1951, the first TV residuals, were paid. They were compensation for the movie re-runs.  To musicians…who had played music in the films, while in production.  (Like “royalties”)  This was set up by the musician’s union, called the American Federation of Musicians.

 

Actor Ronald Reagan

Actor Ronald Reagan

 

Kinoscope: First TV Recordings

Until a recording technology called kinoscope came into use.  In 1952, an actor named Walter Pidgeon, was the president of SAG.  He called for the first SAG strike, and it was then that actors received residuals for recorded performances.

Here’s James Dean, acting on television, in  an early kinoscope recording:

YouTube Preview Image

Again, kinoscope wasn’t the greatest, but it did allow television to be broadcast and shows to be rerun.

 

frank_sinatra_elvis

Frank Sinatra Show with Elvis Presley

The following is a kinoscope  called “The Army Game”.  It was broadcast on television, and starred a young actor: Paul Newman.  

Director Sidney Pollack (who passed away in 2008) was an actor before he became a director.  He c0-stars in this theatrical “television  special”.  

YouTube Preview Image

 

More on this, at a later date…

Best,

Dana

                                                                                     © ®  

actorprep

All Rights Reserved.


Thanks for passing the word! (Especially to you: Twitterers!) Follow my update announcements on “Twitter”, my name is __dana__ .

AND, thanks very much for sharing with your actor friends, there is strength in numbers, for sure…All of you who are putting this blog on Facebook and MySpace–you rock + rule. I am smiling at you, right now!

Huff Post re: AMPTP: “No Good Faith, No Goodwill, No Good Word”"

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 5th December 2008 in SAG Strike + SAG Negotiations

Robert J. Elisberg is a writer; and he is WGA; he’s worked on the editorial staff there.  He went through the Writers’ Strike against the same opponent that SAG is, now, up against.  The AMPTP. 

If you missed the overview about SAG and what the Actors Strike is all about, please click here on, and Hollywood Actor Prep-”Actors Strike Explained, Simply” and, a  new window will open with information for you.  You can also go to the SAG website, for further details.

The Huffington Post ran this experiential post, with it’s utter ugly truth, on Dec. 4, 2008–and I think it’s the most accurate summation I have found.  Versus: The Los Angeles press, and in all the industry papers. I am very disturbed by the coverage that I have read.  It rarely provides any factual information, which I thought was the point of journalism.  Rather, it does provide lots of “smear”, but only against the actors side.  A side, which by the way, I have yet to see, validly, described.  

Basically, the press coverage on SAG (and only SAG, they don’t even bother to put in an opponent) makes actors appear, to the public: greedy, brainless, nuts, narcissistic, clueless.

I am printing Mr Elisberg’s post entirely.  

Because…I think it’s something that everyone should know. It is the truth of this situation.  And it’s not getting out to the rest of the world. And that’s a shame.

 

 

                                                              The AMPTP Strikes Again

                                                                   by Robert J. Elisberg

                         (Reprinted from The Huffington Post  December 4, 2008)

 


After over four months negotiating with the AMPTP conglomerates, the Screen Actors Guild announced they were finally asking their members for a strike authorization vote.

I can feel their pain.

Admittedly, I know more about the writers negotiations than about the actors. But the response from the AMPTP was instantly familiar, pure déjà vu, and equally swaggering, posturing and manipulative bullying. Even by AMPTP standards.

“SAG is the only major Hollywood union that has failed to negotiate a labor deal in 2008,” the AMPTP blustered. “Now SAG is bizarrely asking its members to bail out the failed negotiating strategy with a strike vote – at a time of historic economic crisis.”

Of course, what the AMPTP conveniently leaves out is that it took writers 100 days on strike to get their deal. And the reason SAG has no deal is because the AMPTP corporations have blocked them for four months. This is like blaming someone for not dating you, when you’re the one who said ‘no.’

Worse, though, is when some corporate PR whiz ludicrously floats the buzz words, “bail out,” to invoke public antipathy of government loans. Not only isn’t it “bizarre” for a union to approach its membership, it would be malfeasance if they didn’t.

But mainly, it is the very point that we are in an economic crisis that every worker specifically needs the basic protections the conglomerates are refusing to give.

The challenge for SAG is that it’s being pounded in a perfect storm. Economic conditions make this is a dismal time to strike. A related union, AFTRA, caved early and signed a very weak agreement. And other unions have settled.

Yet many issues SAG is fighting to get are unique to itself. And writers bettered the deal that directors got.

Ultimately, though, it’s terribly scary to even think of striking. During the three months that the seven AMPTP conglomerates refused to settle with the writers, the entire city of Los Angeles took a huge hit.

For SAG, it’s equally scary to think of the alternative, because of the risks to their future.

Consider: much of old media is shifting to New Media. TV will eventually blend with the Internet. It’s already long-since begun.

(Though the AMPTP corporations cry no profit from the new-fangled Internet, the other day CNET reported that Hulu.com – a joint venture between NBC and News Corp. – just made a $12 million profit, streaming video.)

So, consider all this when you understand what the AMPTP multi-national corporations have offered to SAG for its future in New Media -

The proposed minimum rate is zero.
The proposed residual structure is zero.
The proposed overtime protections are zero.
The proposed “forced call” protections are zero.
The proposed protections 
for minors are zero.

As I wrote back during the WGA negotiations, the public understands “zero.”

Here we go again.

It is not for me to speak to SAG needs. I can speak to AMPTP history, however. And as George Santayana wrote, “Those who cannot learn from history are doomed to repeat it.”

Back 24 years ago, the AMPTP offered only 4-cents for videocassette payment, because it needed “studying.” A quarter-century later, when writers finally asked to increase this paltry amount for DVDs, the corporations demanded the request be removed. In good faith, the writers did. The studios got what they wanted – and then walked away.

Through the strike, the AMPTP companies kept insisting they needed time to study the Internet. Afterwards, an online interview with a Warner Bros. president was discovered from two years earlier, showing that their Internet division had already cleared 15,000 TV episodes.

Today – the AMPTP companies have repeatedly tried to subvert their agreement with writers. They’ve failed to make proper payments on streaming, blaming “technology problems.” They’ve even claimed that the new rates for downloading doesn’t apply to any material produced before the strike – and therefore insist they owe nothing on the studio libraries.

That is the history of who SAG is negotiating with. It is wise to keep such history in mind. At the very least, it makes four months of getting nowhere understandable.

It’s likely that during these past four months, the AMPTP conglomerates have been playing theater games with SAG. After all, the AMPTP only negotiates seriously when CEOs themselves show up. Negotiating lawyers are only authorized to say, “No.” The Writers Guild had 100 days of “No.” Then, two CEOs appeared, and it was settled in a week.

After that settlement, AMPTP negotiators acknowledged in private that there was a 100-day strike only because they underestimated the writers’ resolve; noting they would have otherwise settled beforehand.

That may be the biggest hurdle SAG faces now. A strike authorization shows that the SAG team has strong support, in hopes of avoiding a strike. This is the only time the AMPTP takes you seriously. Whether SAG members are willing to show that unified support during difficult times is what we will find out.

No doubt, through all this, some will paint the picture that Actors are Rich and Greedy – in reality, most actors scrabble at the edges, slowly pursuing their career, lucky to get a single speech in a single production. There are 120,000 members of SAG. Count the number of Big Stars you recognize. Now, subtract that from 120,000. That’s the picture. It is a union trying to save itself and its middle class. Like most of America.

SAG faces grueling decisions, balancing its interests and future with AMPTP hard lines. Myriad voices in SAG will argue what is best for them. But making those arguments based on the goodwill, good faith and good word of the AMPTP conglomerates is a guarantee of eternal disappointment. The only voices in SAG worth listening to are theirs alone.


Email Addresses For An Acting Cause, Soon…

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 2nd November 2008 in Professional Actor Involvement, SAG Strike + SAG Negotiations

 

Whether you are an acting professional or not, or even an actor, at all; I would like to ask you to help out. 

 

If I can locate the correct email addresses, I am going to write some letters to let the “powers that be” in Hollywood, that I really think that actors should get paid.  Especially, for the items that the Screen Actors Guild is asking. I would like to get my letter to them, before Wednesday. Because that is the day that the mediator will bring “the word” from each side.

The contract point, of most concern, to me.  The internet will, most likely, be “Actor Central of the Future”.  It looks like there will be far more acting work available, than ever before, on the internet.  And, that the internet will provide more acting work, substantial acting work, soon surpassing any other medium.

There is a lot of pressure, from all sides, to relent and not ask for so much.  I hear things like it’s a bad time to not just relent to a bad deal, “because of the economy”!  Forget how insulting that is…I mean, it is never a great economy for actors!  And I never heard of a studio chief asking for a lower pay due to the economy!  Do you think they would ask for two mill a year, rather than four, with that logic??? 

Certainly, actors deserve to be paid.

The most vocal, anti-SAG, power-people in Hollywood–the ones that have spoken in the press and put all kinds of pressure, and  some fear–also happen to have some very significant investments in internet companies that will be broadcasting viewable content.  Using actors. 

Co-ink-y-dink??

Hey, I am not accusing anyone of anything.  I don’t even claim to know everything.

I just would like to let them know how I feel.

I am hoping you would join me, in that.

So please check back this eve, or tomorrow, and I hopefully will find some notable email addresses, and maybe I’ll even post a letter that you can cut and paste, in case you don’t want a chore!  I’ll make it easy on you!

I really think it’s time to make living the acting life, better.  This is a big way.  Improving money issues in acting careers could fix a large chunk…

 

Best,

Dana

 

Hollywood Actor Prep

Hollywood Actor Prep

 

 

 

 

 

Technorati Profile

The SAG Press Release Discusses Validity of Actor Membership Survey

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 17th September 2008 in SAG Strike + SAG Negotiations

 

Here is the press release, that Alan Rosenberg released today, for the members of the Screen Actors Guild.  I am posting it here, in entirety.  

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

SAG MEMBERS SUPPORT NEGOTIATING TEAM
87.27% SAY NO WAY TO THE AMPTP’S JUNE 30 OFFER

 

Los Angeles, September 17, 2008 - The Screen Actors Guild National Negotiating Committee met today and was given the results of the SAG mail-in poll by National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator, Doug Allen.

87.27% of the10,298 SAG members who responded to the poll said the union should continue bargaining in an effort to achieve a fair contract. 12.73% of those who responded said they would accept the terms presented in the AMPTP’s June 30th offer to SAG.

Postcards were mailed to 103,630 paid-up SAG members on August 28 with a return deadline of September 15, with a 9.94% return. Postcard return statistics matched almost exactly the geographic distribution of SAG members, with 56.07% of the responses from Hollywood, 20.83% from NY, and 23.10% from regional branch members.

The results of the poll indicate that members agree with the actions passed by SAG’s national board in July and August:

July 26, 2008:“It is a core principle of Screen Actors Guild— That no non-union work shall be authorized to be done under any SAG agreement and; That all work done under a Screen Actors Guild contract, regardless of budget level, shall receive fair compensation when reused.“

August 21, 2008:“To support the negotiating team to get the very best contract possible for our membership.”

Screen Actors Guild President Alan Rosenberg stated, “I am encouraged to see that members-at-large agree with the strategy of the national board and their national negotiating committee. This membership poll provides clear insight and direction concerning how actors feel about their futures. Clearly they expect Screen Actors Guild to protect them from exploitation in new media, and to preserve longstanding principles and contract provisions.”

National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator Doug Allen commented, “Our objective was to take the pulse of our members and I am pleased that the response reflects the resolve we have seen from SAG members around the country throughout this negotiating process. The AMPTP suggested we send their June 30 offer to our members to ratify. These poll results indicate that was wishful thinking on their part. We will now urge the AMPTP to roll up their sleeves and to put in the hard work required to bargain a fair, equitable agreement as soon as possible.”

About SAG
Screen Actors Guild is the nation’s largest labor union representing working actors. Established in 1933, SAG has a rich history in the American labor movement, from standing up to studios to break long-term engagement contracts in the 1940s to fighting for artists’ rights amid the digital revolution sweeping the entertainment industry in the 21st century. With 20 branches nationwide, SAG represents over 120,000 actors who work in film and digital television, industrials, commercials, video games, music videos and all other new media formats. The Guild exists to enhance actors’ working conditions, compensation and benefits and to be a powerful, unified voice on behalf of artists’ rights. SAG is a proud affiliate of the AFL-CIO. Headquartered in Los Angeles, you can visit SAG online at www.sag.org
 .


 

SAG’s Standoff—–Why The Celebrities Debate It

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 17th September 2008 in SAG Strike + SAG Negotiations

SAG On YouTube

Why are the celebrities so passionate about this SAG stuff??  Maybe you’ve seen the videos on YouTube…

…Because the SAG negotiations, and the current dispute with AFTRA (in addition to the dispute with AMPTP), affects anyone who has ever been a professional actor, or even a working actor. What’s decided now, will affect even the definition of “acting career”, into the future.

The union exists because acting is a paid profession!  (Ain’t that big news to some of you!   )  ;}

SAG is interested in actors getting paid. All of you.  SAG’s job is to set up contractual rules, about payment.

This whole deal can’t be explained in one post, and I have spent a big chunk-of-time mulling over how to explain the different complexities of the SAG negotiations. I am planning to post some easy explanations on what the fiery debate is over, in my posts here, at “Hollywood Actor Prep Blog”.  It’s not easy. The debates are complicated and dense; and emotionally charged.  

You may have seen some of it in the news. 

Many celebrities that you may have seen on YouTube about this–  are debating something that they are uniformly concerned about: that is, fair and just payment.  MONEY. 

That really means: BEING VALUED.  For the work.  

 

The Different Views on Getting Paid

If you are an actor, or considering a career in the performing arts; well, you may notice a funny thing that happens when you mention “payment” and “acting”.  Culturally.  Some people don’t regard it as a true profession.  It’s kinda the same in these negotiations; debating whether certain acting jobs should be paid for; classifications of types of acting work, and viable areas of acting that should be considered payable areas. Whether or not they should be written in, on contracts.

So often, actors obtain such great reward, just from the acting itself. From doing that which they love! The idea of getting paid almost can, almost, seem like unnecessary “icing on the cake”.

It can seem so far off the point, and so far off in the future; that money-for-acting is rarely a consideration, at all.   

Especially for those that are at a level where the struggle to get any acting role, at all, can be such a challenge.  (It does feel, precisely,  that way, to the great majority of actors, throughout their career.)

I assert here, that it  is imperative to make all this SAG stuff a big priority, no matter what stage you may be in your career.

If you are acting, it’s important now to really be informed, to know all about it. It’s, also important to be involved at your union, and to care…why?

(And, I mean whether a SAG member, yet, or not; but  most especially if  you are.)

If you are an actor, or aspiring…here in Hollywood or far away from LA…one day, you may be in SAG.  One day, you may be making some good money, acting.  At that point, you will want that money to be adequate pay. You will want it to be equitable pay. Appropriate pay.

No matter what kind of work you do, you will want to be paid.  Period.

And if you are serious about acting, surely, there will come a day, when you will be very frustrated if you are not…paid. Even  if it is impossible to imagine that could happen someday, today.

 

So, if you are involved in acting, then I urge you to get involved with what is going on with your union.

Now.  Not later.

Or you may not be paid, later.

 

Best,

:Dana

 

 

PS Please bookmark or subscribe to my blog, to keep up the information.

Here’s the websites for SAG and AFTRA, you might want to bookmark them too.

Articles: Complications and Effects of the SAG Negotiations

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 10th September 2008 in SAG Strike + SAG Negotiations

I am providing some articles from the web. They give an overview, and foundation, but some of the information may be outdated; you’ll notice it, if so.  

They give a good background, overall.

 

FROM WIKIPEDIA:

 

(All in italics is directly from the wikipedia site, their notes…)

The strike would stem from the current handling of royalties from the sale of films distributed through new  methods. This includes royalties earned from Internet distribution services such as iTunes, as well as DVD sales, neither of which are currently written into actors’ contracts. The strike date was set for July 7, 2008, chosen due to its coinciding with the expiration of several contracts between the labor union and the AMPTP. Talks are currently being held on the possible terms of a renewal, but the two sides* are reportedly far from any deal.

[Dana's author note: *AFTRA did, in fact, settle. SAG did not; and the settlement by AFTRA created conflict between the two actors unions.]

 

 

FROM TV GUIDE, BRITISH EDITION:

US screen actors’ guild has no plans to strike: union chief

Jun 29, 2008

LOS ANGELES (AFP) — The president of the US Screen Actors Guild said on Sunday there were no immediate plans to strike against Hollywood studios, even though a contract with the studios was set to expire late Monday.

“We have taken no steps to initiate a strike authorization vote by the members of Screen Actors Guild. Any talk about a strike or a management lockout at this point is simply a distraction,” said SAG president Alan Rosenberg in a statement.

With the contract due to expire at midnight on Monday, negotiations between the Screen Actors Guild (SAG) and the Alliance of Motion Picture and Television Producers (AMPTP) have so far failed to produce a deal, raising concerns of another crippling Hollywood strike after a screenwriters’ walkout earlier this year.

But Rosenberg said talks would continue.

“The Screen Actors Guild national negotiating committee is coming to the bargaining table every day in good faith to negotiate a fair contract for actors,” he said.

Entertainment industry press have said most major movie studios had already planned their schedules to complete filming on existing projects by Monday.

And television studios were reportedly set to carry on filming episodes for as long as possible to stockpile material in case of a strike.

Complicating the issue is a feud between SAG, with 120,000 members, and the other major actors union, the 70,000-strong American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA), after the smaller union gave tentative approval to a deal proposed by the studios.

SAG’s leaders say the agreement undermines their own negotiating position, and are aggressively lobbying 44,000 guild members who also belong to AFTRA, urging them to reject the deal when it goes to a vote.

The spat between the two unions has pitted A-list actors against fellow stars, with the likes of Tom Hanks, Kevin Spacey and Alec Baldwin siding with AFTRA and Jack Nicholson and Ben Stiller supporting the guild.

The disagreement prompted George Clooney to issue a statement on Thursday calling for unity, saying a split between the unions would only strengthen the position of the studios.

“The one thing you can be sure of is that stories about Jack Nicholson vs. Tom Hanks only strengthens the negotiating power of the AMPTP,” Clooney said.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes