Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Reddit button

Posts Tagged ‘Matt Damon’

The Handsome Club :: Handsome Actors + Jimmy Kimmel

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 14th March 2010 in Funny Stuff, comedy

All of these handsome actors in one room at the same time?

Not really, or the comic timing would be a little more tuned, and a big audience would have boosted the comic energy. But, it’s cute and kinda funny, and JohnKrasinski shows his comic mojo–in his simple delivery of short lines.

Not only is his timing swell, but it all works, why? Because even with one or two lines, he’s in it. He’s able to not be on the ‘outside looking in’ while acting.

Using some reverse Hollywood sexism here: I forgive them for their comedy-acting-trespasses. They really are great to look at. [I know my female and gay readers will dig this one.]

What Handsome Actors are in this video?

Josh Hartnett, Ethan Hawke, Rob Lowe, Lenny Kravitz, Matt Damon, Ben Affleck, Matthew McConaughey, Sting, Patrick Dempsey, Tony Romo, John Krasinski, Keith Urban, Taye Diggs, and a French shirtless guy whose name I can’t eludes me because I’m hypnotised…

Enjoy…

[Straight male?... You may wish to go back one post, to the Marion Cotillard breast parody...]

;~Dana

Morgan Freeman On The Acting Quality Of Matt Damon

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 3rd November 2009 in Skilled Acting

“Matt Damon Is A Journeyman [Actor].”

That’s what Morgan Freeman said, in the NY Times article that I quoted yesterday. One professional actor, commenting on the work of another. Dennis Lim, the author of the piece, considered what Freeman said about Damon, a compliment. Why, do you think, Lim recognized it as such?

–Click to  read referenced Hollywood Actor Prep post.–

Then, Morgan Freeman said, “He always gets the job done. There’s no strain in his work.”

For me, that’s huge. This simple sentence describes, in very few words, a very high level of quality, of acting. One of the rarest and finest attributes an actor can be able to pull off. Oddly, it’s one of those acting traits, that is assumed, expected; but that you rarely see, in performance. Not often noted, by critics, yet it doesn’t require an eye of a connoisseur. It sounds so simple, even the description is as simple as can be; yet, it is something that not only is not found often, and is very hard to do (!), but many actors don’t seem to be aware of this higher standard. Often, it doesn’t appear to be attempted.

Most actors, and I do mean, most; are very busy “acting”. Performing. With very visible “acting” and “performing”. The “acting-without-strain” that Freeman mentions, is a rarely talked-about, written-about discernment, but it’s profoundly different, in terms of acting artistry. In terms of quality of acting, complexity, and ability. It’s a subtle difference, perhaps, but very different.

There are two important effects that occur when there is “no strain”.  (I usually use another word: “seamless”.  Another term is un-self-conscious acting.)

It allows more room for the story. The script then becomes the central focus, rather than the acting, or the actor.  In order to get there, the actor has to honor the writer, the script and the story, the whole project, more than his or her own ego. (I could describe this with more finesse, I just don’t have time!  See prior post …)

I’d guess, that the audience is more involved, then, as well. Audience participation may be silent; but it is their active participation in the story, that is the goal of every production, any kind.

What do you think about Morgan Freeman’s statement? Comment here, tell me on Twitter…I’ll probably set up a forum soon, so we can get into this. I’ll write more throughout this week, too.

Best,

;~Dana

Please share this by Retweeting, or putting on your Facebook. You can use the easy icons above. Thank you for sharing this to someone else.

And comment, if you’d like! I’d love to hear from you.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes