Rss Feed
Tweeter button
Facebook button
Reddit button

Posts Tagged ‘acting process’

Actor Michelle Monaghan On Increasing Women’s Roles, Character Development, and ‘Trucker’ Trailers

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 27th October 2009 in playing a character

“I Wanted This Role So Bad! …I Loved The Story And The Character, And I Trusted The Director.”

Actor  Michelle Monaghan’s star is rising fast, and she’s been getting some great parts. Here’s how she works, her acting process. Here’s also what she thinks about the business, and women’s parts in movies.

(In Contention)

The film tells the gritty story of Diane, a long-haul trucker, driving 18-wheelers across the country, hellbent on getting that all-important on-time bonus. She doesn’t shy away from one-night stands, leaving many a guy wondering what him him, nor does she feel the least bit guilty about hanging out with a married man, though there is nothing betwen them. Her life is sent into a tailspin when she is suddenly faced with a son from a marriage in another life, the boy’s father having been hospitalized with cancer.
Forced to think about someone other than herself, Diane is not sure she is up to it, but in the days that she has with the boy, she discovers a humanity within herself she didn’t know existed. It is a spiky relationship, but one that will considerably impact the two of them.
In many ways the film is a return to the sort of picture made in the 1970s, such as “Five Easy Pieces” and “The King of Marvin Gardens,” though in this case, the lead is a female.  “I wanted this role so bad,”Monaghan says.  “I mean, I loved the story and the character, and I trusted the director to go in the right direction.  I like that Diane is not a victim.  She is a carefree, independent woman who lives by her own rules in her own world, and though she may be immature in many ways, there’s a lot to like about her.
“And I admired her honesty,” Monaghan adds.  “She never lies.  She always tells the truth and is not a victim at all. And I really liked that she lived in what was mainly a male-dominated world.”
When she took on the role, Monaghan says it was imperative for her to learn to drive a big rig in order do the character some authentic  justice.  “I couldn’t even drive a five speed when I started,” she exclaims.  “So for two or three hours a day for three weeks I trained to get my CDL, so yeah, I went to truck driving school. It really mattered to me that I did this, it really mattered that I got this right. These are real people with real struggles.  I knew I had to honor that with the best I could possibly give.”
“I saw Diane as mustang, a wild horse,” she continues.  “And my director told me of a film he had made about wild mustangs, and no matter how hard they tried to rope this one mare, they could not do it, she was going to stay wild. So I saw Diane like that. I don’t know if you noticed but I had a fake tatoo on my shoulder, Wild Mustang, and I think that represents Diane. I tried to achieve that in small ways in my physicality, in the way I moved, the way I moved my head, things like that, and I don’t know if it comes across, but it helped me get there.”
The explanation is perfect because the character is indeed carefree, with a wild streak in her, certainly not wanting to settle down and play family. For me, I tell her, the mustand metaphor is perfect. But as she left her child, is she a bad person?
“She is brutally honest,” she explains.  “She never lies, and personally, I have a lot of respect for someone like that. She’s not where a lot of people her age are at in their lives, but it’s not my job, the job of the actor I mean, to judge her, and certainly James [Mottern, the director] never judged her. She is who she is, no surprises.”
In the last few years there have been several films offering strong roles for women, which have given us an array of great performances such as Maggie Gyllenhall in “Sherrybaby,” Kate Winslet in “Revolutionary Road,” Ellen Page in “Juno,” Meryl Streep and Amy Adams in “Doubt” and Helen Mirren in “The Queen,” to name a few.  Monaghan says she believes there has been a small turnaround in cinema with stronger roles coming to the fair sex, which she finds quite exciting.“That is so refreshing,” she says.  “I would like to see more…The roles are there; sometimes the challenge is getting the film seen.”
“We worked so hard on it,” she says.  “I would be happy if more people saw the film, and if being nominated for an Academy Award brings 10 or 20 more people to the theater to buy a ticket, that makes me very happy. This is something we are all very proud of, something we made in less than a month if you can believe that, so I just want to get people out there to see the movie.”
When asked about working with the caliber of actors she has had the chance to work with, there is immediate admiration in her voice.”…I come away better than I was before, because each actor is different in their approach to the work, and the ones I have worked with have been so willing to share with me. I studied journalism, and I have used my five W’s (who, where, what, when and why) in creating my characters, because I write about them a lot, creating a history for each. So merging the writing knowledge and the fact I can watch and listen together, I have learned so much.”
There is a refreshing reality in everything Monaghan does that comes from some honest place deep inside of her. She wants to succeed, she wants to be good, she wants the work to be truthful, and the one thing she learned about herself on “Trucker,” she says, is that she is stubborn.
“It helped me in the role,” she says.  “It helped me find Diane and define Diane. We share that I suppose. And you know she’s still with me, I’m still digesting the whole experience, and I found her hard to let go.”

The film tells the gritty story of Diane, a long-haul trucker, driving 18-wheelers across the country, hellbent on getting that all-important on-time bonus. She doesn’t shy away from one-night stands, leaving many a guy wondering what him him, nor does she feel the least bit guilty about hanging out with a married man, though there is nothing betwen them. Her life is sent into a tailspin when she is suddenly faced with a son from a marriage in another life, the boy’s father having been hospitalized with cancer.

Forced to think about someone other than herself, Diane is not sure she is up to it, but in the days that she has with the boy, she discovers a humanity within herself she didn’t know existed. It is a spiky relationship, but one that will considerably impact the two of them.

In many ways the film is a return to the sort of picture made in the 1970s, such as “Five Easy Pieces” and “The King of Marvin Gardens,” though in this case, the lead is a female.  “I wanted this role so bad,”Monaghan says.  “I mean, I loved the story and the character, and I trusted the director to go in the right direction.  I like that Diane is not a victim.  She is a carefree, independent woman who lives by her own rules in her own world, and though she may be immature in many ways, there’s a lot to like about her.

“And I admired her honesty,” Monaghan adds.  “She never lies.  She always tells the truth and is not a victim at all. And I really liked that she lived in what was mainly a male-dominated world.”

When she took on the role, Monaghan says it was imperative for her to learn to drive a big rig in order do the character some authentic  justice.  “I couldn’t even drive a five speed when I started,” she exclaims.  “So for two or three hours a day for three weeks I trained to get my CDL, so yeah, I went to truck driving school. It really mattered to me that I did this, it really mattered that I got this right. These are real people with real struggles.  I knew I had to honor that with the best I could possibly give.”

“I saw Diane as mustang, a wild horse,” she continues.  “And my director told me of a film he had made about wild mustangs, and no matter how hard they tried to rope this one mare, they could not do it, she was going to stay wild. So I saw Diane like that. I don’t know if you noticed but I had a fake tattoo on my shoulder, Wild Mustang, and I think that represents Diane. I tried to achieve that in small ways in my physicality, in the way I moved, the way I moved my head, things like that, and I don’t know if it comes across, but it helped me get there.”

But as she left her child, is she a bad person?

“She is brutally honest,” she explains.  “She never lies, and personally, I have a lot of respect for someone like that. She’s not where a lot of people her age are at in their lives, but it’s not my job, the job of the actor I mean, to judge her, and certainly James [Mottern, the director] never judged her. She is who she is, no surprises.”actor-michelle-monaghan

In the last few years there have been several films offering strong roles for women, which have given us an array of great performances such as Maggie Gyllenhall in “Sherrybaby”, Kate Winslet in “Revolutionary Road,” Ellen Page in “Juno,” Meryl Streep and Amy Adams in “Doubt” , and Helen Mirren in “The Queen”, to name a few.  Monaghan says she believes there has been a small turnaround in cinema with stronger roles coming to the fair sex, which she finds quite exciting.“That is so refreshing,” she says.  “I would like to see more…The roles are there; sometimes the challenge is getting the film seen.”

“We worked so hard on it,” she says.  “I would be happy if more people saw the film, and if being nominated for an Academy Award brings 10 or 20 more people to the theater to buy a ticket, that makes me very happy. This is something we are all very proud of, something we made in less than a month if you can believe that, so I just want to get people out there to see the movie.”

When asked about working with the caliber of actors she has had the chance to work with, there is immediate admiration in her voice.”…I come away better than I was before, because each actor is different in their approach to the work, and the ones I have worked with have been so willing to share with me. I studied journalism, and I have used my five W’s (who, where, what, when and why) in creating my characters, because I write about them a lot, creating a history for each. So merging the writing knowledge and the fact I can watch and listen together, I have learned so much.”

There is a refreshing reality in everything Monaghan does that comes from some honest place deep inside of her. She wants to succeed, she wants to be good, she wants the work to be truthful, and the one thing she learned about herself on “Trucker,” she says, is that she is stubborn.

“It helped me in the role,” she says.  “It helped me find Diane and define Diane. We share that I suppose. And you know she’s still with me, I’m still digesting the whole experience, and I found her hard to let go.”

For a list of Michelle Monaghan’s credits, click on this link to IMDB.

Please share this, and retweet it. Thanks for paying it forward to actors, or anyone who may enjoy it.

Upcoming Interview Teaser :: Actor Who Plays Soraya M.

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 8th July 2009 in Film acting movie actors

I’m editing my ‘exclusive’ interview with actor Mozhan Marno…until it’s finished, I thought I’d show you a little teaser.

If you don’t recognize her name, you may recognize the name of the movie she’s playing a lead in: ‘The Stoning Of Soraya M.’

Actor Mozhan Marno

Actor Mozhan Marno

I urge you to see the movie, first, before watching the entire interview; which I am planning to post next week, in entirety. (If you watch the interview first, it may ruin the full illusion, the power of the story.)

I wanted to interview Mozhan because, prior, while watching the movie, I had no idea that any of the actors were American.(…’Nuff said…already too much revealed…)

The Stoning Of Soraya M--Mozhan Marno plays Soraya

The language spoken, in the film, is Farsi. That contributed to the feeling of ‘being there’. That, the cinematography, the direction

And, the acting.

YouTube Preview Image

I’d like to spill, right here, all of the really interesting stuff that I recorded…Because after seeing the film and then meeting with Mozhan, the actor; I was so surprised at how very different she is, than the character. And what an interesting background she has had…And early career path…Acting experiences

As an actor, I was thrilled to discover what I did, about her. I think you will be too…

…But, again, I refrain myself. I don’t want to be a spoiler.

Please go see the movie, ‘The Stoning Of Soraya M.’…if you plan to. ASAP.

I am planning to post the interview with Mozhan Marno sometime next week.

Here’s two tidbits, to whet your whistle…

YouTube Preview Image YouTube Preview Image

Click here, to go to the website for the movie, itself. It will open in a different window.

hprep logo blue jean cloud bg lilacframe copy copy copy

Please share this with a friend, especially any actors you know. You can easily do so, by using the “Share Save” button below…

I am committed to Hollywood Actor Prep, to benefit actors and those with an interest in acting.——-Simple——There’s no charge, except that I ask for you to spread the value around, by sharing my blog with others.

Thanks for doing so, and thanks for participating with me…

Best,

Dana

What is an– Actors’ Director?

Posted by Dana Kaminski on 6th November 2008 in Fine Film Acting

A director who loves actors?

Well, … that, too…

Without thinking about it a whole lot; I’d say, it’s a director who is one or a combination of this list…

  • Makes the acting performances the priority, sometimes above their other directorial tasks 
  • Respects acting as an art form
  • Has a passion for acting; loves and trusts the process of acting 
  • The acting in his/her movies possesses depth, complexity, subtext
  • The story of the film, itself, often has subtext
  • Not only loves acting and actors, but treats them well; establishes trust from the actor 
  • Takes the acting to heights or complexity that even the actor may not have done before, or on his/her own,
  • He or she enables and facilitates a sense of  ”discovery”…that is clearly going on during filming; within the story, for the individual characters; this gives a feeling of being in the present.
  • The director may have had some acting experience of their own, or some theatre background 
  • Artistic-types, in varying degrees. ( the left brain types).  Like architects, can work from both sides of the brain, simultaneously.
  • Independent thinkers, creative thinkers

 

Actors’ directors are not only confident, and comfortable, with the artistic process and discovery, as they work ; they depend on that process to be  ”the predominant compass”. (And they can deal with the accompanying ambiguity and ambivalence) 

That means that there are “parts unknown”, in the planning stage, and throughout the shooting schedule. So they do give up control, in certain areas…Not all aspects, of course.  But, they  value the things that they leave out of their control, far more.  

They allow their movie, to be like theatre in the experience;  in the elements that only will occur when the scenes are shot… this kind of director allows those elements to evolve, to create themselves. With trust, they relish these areas.

Because they know that, there, in that unknown, is when the most compelling parts of the film are created…and that when they give up control; they allow art to occur, instead. 

When I hear the term “actors’ director”… I think, of Elia Kazan, the prototype.

Elia Kazan

 

Elia Kazan was, as an actor, a member of the famous Group Theatre.  Later, he was one of the founding members of the Actors’ Studio…

Kazan, clearly, had a deep passion for the art of acting.  Is that a necessity, in order to make a great movie?  For that answer, just watch one or two.  (I do mean watch the entire movie, to really see what I am referring to; here’s a few clips for now.)

 

YouTube Preview Image                     

Before coming to Hollywood for films, Kazan directed plays for the New York stage.

In the 1950’s, he directed William Inge’s “The Dark At The Top Of The Stairs”, which ran on Broadway. This is an excerpt from an interview with actress, Teresa Wright, a lead in that play.

She refers to Kazan by his nickname, “Gadg”… 
 

There is absolutely no one who can come anywhere near Gadg. I felt, in a way, that I’d never been directed before. He’s the first person that ever really directed me. By directed, I don’t mean he told me what to do.

Again, it’s a question of bringing out something from you, but he doesn’t just sit back and wait for something, the right thing, to come out of you — as, for instance, Willie Wyler does.

He guides or talks or analyzes the character with you so much that you begin to see insights into both yourself and the character that you just weren’t aware of. I have never known anyone who had the knowledge of people that he has.

I never knew anyone in my life who is as keenly aware, as articulate in talking about it, and he’s so spontaneous in his talking. It isn’t a set “this is what I’ve learned about people” sort of thing. He approaches each character, and each situation that that character might have to face, and sort of opens himself up to it completely — and as he opens himself up to it, he shares with you this tremendous insight and knowledge and compassion that he has for people, and excitement.

I can’t help feeling that there are an awful lot of people who tried to copy the outward signs of Gadg’s approach — they sort of go at each part, open it, examine it — but always you feel it’s kind of studied. “This is what I’m going to say about this part,” or — with Gadg you don’t feel that.

You always feel that he is absolutely experiencing his discovery with you, this knowledge. He really opens himself up, and forces you to open yourself, which is his great gift. It isn’t this coldly sitting back and analyzing.

I think the key is, it’s done with that great really caring. It makes a difference. Creatively, at the moment, experiencing something with you.

You never once feel his theatrical knowledge imposed on you. You never once feel that you’re doing something for some theatrical effect, and yet certainly he is the most effective theatrically. I heard nothing but praise of Kazan, but not what I saw. I used to sit and listen, as he told things to each character in the play. Each little thing that came up, he’d explore it so, with such enthusiasm. He is the most creative person I have ever met, ever worked with, ever heard about.

 

YouTube Preview Image

 

In the Hollywood Reporter, I found an interview with  Julian Fellowes, and he discusses Robert Altman…. (Fellows is an actor/writer/producer and Oscar-winning director...)

“I was standing next to him for the whole thing. It was a unique opportunity to see the business of directing from a ringside seat,” he says of working as a writer on the set. “(Directing) is like tennis, you learn by playing with people who are better than you.”

“He really likes actors. He’s not faking it,” says Fellowes, who studied acting at London’s prestigious Webber Douglas Academy of Dramatic Art, which produced Terence Stamp and Julia Ormond, among others. “He wants to hear their opinions. As an actor, it was what I always craved. You really want as an actor to be treated as one of the grown-ups. Half the time, you are treated as a demented child who has wandered onto the set.”

“I’m a big believer in listening to actors,” he says. “There’s a reason why they are successful. They have good instincts, and they made good choices.”

In fact, he says there is no greater compliment than to be called an actor’s director.

 

Best,

;-Dana

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes